A few months ago, this website reported on the fact that
one of TMTA's member companies appeared to finally be
getting a break. That company was (and continues to be)
BryTech Inc. , an Ottawa-based manufacturer of assistive
devices. Like many other
Canadian SMEs, this innovative company has been a
wellspring of technical creativity. As a matter of fact
some of its inventions are even
internationally
recognized. In spite of that, the
company has been struggling to get its own inventions
recognized and approved in Canada.
The
company was finally being given the go-ahead
Early in 2011, it seemed as if the spell was being broken. After a long process of
negotiations with some key healthcare players in the
Ottawa area, the company was given the go-ahead to proceed with formal trials
using its breakthrough mobile patient monitoring system
(RPM™) in real-life settings.
The trial was being set up through a collaborative and
strategic alliance with an Ottawa-area educational
faculty, a hospital, a long-term care facility and a
telecommunications provider. Designed to allow a range
of care providers to test BryTech’s RPM within several
different healthcare settings, the trial would
eventually accelerate the adoption of new
equipment. The hope was that this move would, in turn, provide
much needed relief
to the critical overcrowding situation present in many
hospitals across Ontario, Canada and even the world.
Throughput is
increased when patients can move recover more quickly
Created to enhance efficiency across the healthcare
sector, BryTech’s portable device enables care
providers to monitor patients much more easily and
effectively than previously possible. The tiny device offers
continuous monitoring for mobile patients in a wide
range of medical conditions which require constant
surveillance. Facilities can move
patients through the continuum of care faster while
actually providing them with a higher quality of care.
As most hospital administrators know, the throughput of
the ICU or OR departments is increased when patients can
move more quickly from recovery to step down facilities.
The hospital can handle more patients when it can move
them out into the community earlier in the healing
process. Patients also benefit greatly because they gain
more mobility and independence and can return to an
improved lifestyle sooner. What’s more, the rate of
hospital readmission is reduced because the RPM offers
better controls, earlier warning and considerably
increased visibility of every patient’s condition.
The RPM can lessen
the workload of hospital staff
Granted, continuous monitoring of patients after their
discharge from hospital is a somewhat new paradigm. But it is comparable to
current homecare practices that are prescribed by
physicians for the patient after hospitalization.
Present day homecare requires the collaboration of a
home care service agency to take responsibility for the
patient, respond to alarms and collect and interpret the
data generated.
Once again, the RPM can step in to
reduce the demands being made on over-worked hospital
staff. Because of its extreme simplicity, the device
requires a minimum of training before it can be assigned
to patients The staff at a hospital, long-term care
facility or nursing home needs training and support. A
strategic alliance with telecommunications carriers is
required for connectivity. The cost of monitoring
must be supported by the LHIN to determine correct
reimbursement strategies.
A great aid for nurse
practitioners
Increased strain on healthcare systems in Canada and
many parts of the world, has led to the creation of a
new position in many hospitals: the nurse practitioner.
While not as skilled as a doctor, this individual can
help to significantly relieve the problems brought about
by a shortage of doctors and provide a skill level
between physicians and nurses. The solution to the
shortage of hospital beds is to create a level of care
between the hospital bed and the nursing home.
Adding
the advantage of mobility created the need for a
wearable patient monitor, tracked by professionals who
can verify recovery or detect the early signs of
deterioration, this is a growth opportunity for existing
home care service agencies that provide regular service.
Remote monitoring technology allows
more patients to be assessed frequently and critical
events to be detected.
Why so many delays? So the case is made. The RPM is an ideally
suited solution for a key healthcare challenge. And the
healthcare system has been given an opportunity to test
it in real-life situations. So why is it that the trials
keep getting postponed? The process should have started
more than six months ago. But BryTECH keeps getting the
run-around.
The authorities in question keep saying that they cannot
proceed with the trials because funding has not yet been
approved. In the meantime, BryTECH's owner has to keep
footing the bill for a product that should have been
commercialized many months ago. Meanwhile, a very
similar device is being tested in a Toronto hospital.
While extremely similar to the RPM, this device appears
to benefit from a situation that BryTECH's invention can
not capitalize on: it is manufactured by a large multinational.
Miraculously, funding for trials for this device
is not lacking. Why is this happening? BryTECH would
like to know. And so would we. As would many TMTA
members. Could it be that other forces are at
play? Forces that can help speed the funding process and
cut through red tape? As most TMTA members will attest,
this kind of situation is by no means rare. Many small
Canadian companies struggle to get their inventions
recognized while larger, often foreign, companies seem
to be given all the breaks. Why do situations like this
keep happening? Why are foreign manufacturers being
preferred over Canadian companies?